winforms tiff

winforms tiff

winforms tiff

foxit pdf print manager sdk .net, itextsharp add image to existing pdf vb.net, c# export excel sheet to pdf, word to pdf .net sdk, merge pdf c# itextsharp, telerik pdf viewer mvc, xspdf pdf to image .net library, .net pdf library extract text, convert pdf to excel using itextsharp in c#, .net pdf to image open source

took almost 20 times as much CPU time to insert the rows without bind variables. For every insert without bind variables, we spent the vast preponderance of the time to execute the statement simply parsing the statement! But it gets worse. When we look at other information, we can see a significant difference in the resources utilized by each approach: Name STAT...parse count (hard) STAT...parse count (total) STAT...consistent gets from ca STAT...consistent gets STAT...consistent gets from ca LATCH.simulator hash latch STAT...db block gets from cach STAT...db block gets STAT...db block gets from cach LATCH.enqueues LATCH.enqueue hash chains STAT...session logical reads STAT...recursive calls LATCH.kks stats STAT...session uga memory STAT...session pga memory LATCH.cache buffers chains LATCH.shared pool simulator LATCH.row cache objects LATCH.shared pool LATCH.JS slv state obj latch Run1 5 34 78 135 135 83 10,440 10,440 79 40 74 10,575 10,326 23 0 0 51,532 42 294 20,302 1 Run2 10,010 10,055 10,120 10,290 10,290 10,990 30,364 30,364 20,041 20,372 20,414 40,654 40,960 65,141 65,512 65,536 120,773 104,558 184,697 446,397 435,890 Diff 10,005 10,021 10,042 10,155 10,155 10,907 19,924 19,924 19,962 20,332 20,340 30,079 30,634 65,118 65,512 65,536 69,241 104,516 184,403 426,095 435,889

When considering an OVERFLOW segment, however, PCTFREE and PCTUSED have the same interpretation as they do for a heap table; set them for an overflow segment using the same logic as you would for a heap table.

vb.net print tiff image, c# tiff encoder, word ean 13 barcode font, upc-a barcode excel, c# code to convert tiff to jpg, c# tiff editor

4.1.2 Using reflective APIs To demonstrate the use of reflective APIs, let s modify the simple tracing aspect that we wrote in chapter 2. If you recall, JoinPointTraceAspect used simple reflective support to print the information for all the join points as the code in the classes executed. We will use the same unmodified classes, Account, InsufficientBalanceException , and SavingsAccount , from listings 2.5, 2.6, and 2.7. The abstract Account class provides the methods for debiting, crediting, and querying the account balance. The SavingsAccount class extends Account to a savings account. We will modify the versions of the Test class (from listing 2.8) and JoinPointTraceAspect (from listing 2.9) so that our new example will use the reflection API to log detailed messages that show information not only about the methods invoked, but also about the objects involved in each method invocation. To limit the output, we first remove the call to the debit() method in the Test program as shown in listing 4.1.

Run1 latches total versus runs -- difference and pct Run1 Run2 Diff Pct 73,082 1,411,695 1,338,613 518% PL/SQL procedure successfully completed The runstats utility produces a report that shows differences in latch utilization as well as differences in statistics Here I asked runstats to print out anything with a difference greater than 10,000 You can see that we hard parsed 4 times in the first approach using bind variables, and that we hard parsed over 10,000 times without bind variables (once for each of the inserts) But that difference in hard parsing is just the tip of the iceberg You can see here that we used almost 20 times as many latches in the non-bind variable approach as we did with bind variables That difference might beg the question What is a latch Let s answer that question.

I generally find people s understanding of what a cluster is in Oracle to be inaccurate Many people tend to confuse a cluster with a SQL Server or Sybase clustered index They are not the same A cluster is a way to store a group of tables that share some common column(s) in the same database blocks and to store related data together on the same block A clustered index in SQL Server forces the rows to be stored in sorted order according to the index key, similar to an IOT as just described With a cluster, a single block of data may contain data from many tables Conceptually, you are storing the data prejoined It can also be used with single tables, where you are storing data together grouped by some column.

A latch is a type of lock that is used to serialize access to shared data structures used by Oracle The shared pool is an example; it s a big shared data structure found in the System Global Area (SGA), and this is where Oracle stores parsed, compiled SQL When you modify this shared structure, you must take care to allow only one process in at a time (It is very bad if two processes or threads attempt to update the same in-memory data structure simultaneously corruption would abound) So, Oracle employs a latching mechanism, a lightweight locking method to serialize access Don t be fooled by the word lightweight Latches are serialization devices, allowing access one process at a time The latches used by the hard-parsing implementation are some of the most used latches out there These include the latches for the shared pool and for the library cache.

get coordinates of text in pdf online, java ocr pdf to text, annotate pdf online google docs, jquery pdf preview plugin